First-Year Shared-Reading (FYSR): Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro.
Hey guys, welcome to my first blog, and my first bit of the real college experience: FYSR. Basically, FSU generously gave a paperback copy of a novel to each student at Orientation, which is to be read prior to the first week of classes. The title of the book is by Kazuo Ishiguro, and I know only a couple things about it:
-It is considered “science fiction”.
-It has something to do with cloning.
Now, at Orientation I overheard a whole bunch of Freshman lamenting the idea of Summer reading, and joking with their friends that they were not planning to read the book. That’s great, but I feel compelled to read the book for two reasons:
1. This is our first assignment in college, and I’d rather step off on the right foot. What’s the point of wasting all that money to get into a huge University to blow off assignments before you have even sat in a single class? That is seriously lazy. I don’t know about all of you, but I know my major is extremely competitive and I have no time to be lazy this early in the game.
2. If you have even been in any AP English course with Mr. Hammy-Hammond, this isn’t something new. Staring year one (AP English Language, Junior), the summer assignment was huge. We had to choose a novel of serious literary merit (mine was by Stephen Jay Gould), read it, write a page of journal entry for every few pages (ended up being 40-some-odd pages), and write an essay about whether ignorance is really bliss or not. That was before even stepping into his presence. Then second year (AP English Literature, Senior), we had to do a summer reading project (I believe it was Truman Capote’s ), and pick a controversial topic (In Vitro Meat, FTW) to organize both sides of a debate. So not only did we read a book each summer, we completed extensive assignments as well.
So with all of this in mind, I began my reading, and using the 34 question guide, I decided to begin writing blogs about the book (the answers are opinionated and aren’t required to be written down, so there is really no point of stealing my opinions). The purpose of this is to keep me on track (who wants to let the people of the internets see you fail at reading and completing questions), organize my thoughts, and perhaps help and receive ideas from other students who are in the same garnet and gold boat. I will post a new blog every 4-5 questions and try to keep a steady pace.
Let’s go ahead and dive in:
Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro
Pages Read: 1-37 (through Chapter 3).
Unfamiliar terms: No. The language is not overly advanced (coughmismeasureofmancough), so I don’t see defining words as a pressing issue.
Questions:
1. How did the words “gallery,” “donation,” and “carer” come into play when you read the first part of the book and what do you think they mean?
The first word mentioned of these three was “carer”, and I got the shallow meaning as someone who cares for others. Obvious, I know. There lies more significance in who Kathy is caring for, which has not arose so early in the novel. With my rationalizations about the other words in this question, I have made a somewhat educated guess that they are the people from which the genes for cloning come from. If they are to be an origin of life for someone else, they would need great amounts of care to stay healthy.
The “gallery” hasn’t really been dwelled into all that much; it is a place for creative works of high esteem to be gathered. The reason behind this has not been explained, but a hypothesis would be that children who produce beautiful art are more desirable candidates to be cloned.
Most obvious to me seemed to be “donation”, which would be the matter from the children which would be cloned (the DNA prior to the multiplication process). Just another theory, but I can’t be that far off, can I?
2. Between Kathy, Ruth, and Tommy, which one do you think you would get along with the most and why?
I hate this kind of question, because I hate attempting to form personal relationships with a person on paper. They each have very different characteristics which people can identify with, which I suppose is the whole point of this question.
Ruth is strong, a leader who is constantly being looked up to. She doesn’t really use her power for good or bad, which I would have a problem with if we were friends. What is the point of having that strength, knowing you can help the people being teased (i.e. Tommy at this point), yet making no effort to help?
I always find it hard to identify with a narrator, but I see she attempts to change the world around her and is a caring individual. I would probably get along with her pretty well, because she is not overly assertive but doesn’t let people walk all over her.
I would have issues with Tommy because of his preceding anger issues. He obviously doesn’t cope well with his peers and lets them effect him when what they say and do doesn’t matter. He’s started getting better at it, but we’ll see where he ends up.
3. At Hailsham, the importance of creativity is stressed. How do you think creativity will be important in your college career?
For me, personally, it will be a matter of standing out among 400 of my peers. I’ve always used my creativity to get noticed, and that should continue through my college career.
4. Why do you think that Madame is “scared” of the kids at Hailsham? She was afraid of them like spiders, yet she still wanted their work.Why do you think she keeps coming back if she was afraid? Have you ever felt like a “spider”; how did it affect you? (p. 35)
For the first part, my reasoning fails to link to my theory here. If they are the clones themselves, maybe the aspect of them not being normal is threatening. Matching with my theory, if they are the “clonees”, so to speak, then perhaps she doesn’t want to infect them with any sort of germs, or again it could be the unfamiliar part of them, that they are to become multiple people, that is scary to her.
She keeps coming back because she wants the art. Maybe she wants the creative bit detached from the physical human bit which she seems to not like.
As for feeling like a “spider”, it’s kind of an odd concept. No one is really afraid of me for who I am; I don’t see this being a huge issue for 90% of the people reading this book.
That is all I have so far. It is an interesting book; kind of slow with all of the flashbacks through the first chapters, but for some reason I find myself compelled to find where the cloning bit comes into play. Please feel free to comment, particularly if you are reading or have read the story. Please, don’t post any spoilers. 
- shannon's blog
- 470 reads
Technorati Tags: 
I can’t believe FSU
I can’t believe FSU decided to copy UF’s decision to make students read a dumb book that nobody cares to read and will NEVER get used in ANY classes because all the professors have much more important things to talk about! I hated having to read Mountains Beyond Mountains, only to discover upon starting classes that nobody even mentioned it. I hope you don’t waste your time reading it, since I can almost guarantee that you will not need it for any classes, other than some sort of “First Year Florida” (that’s what they call it here) class for Freshmen, a class that serves no purpose other than to waste time and be an easy 1-credit A.
P.S. I look forward to beating your school (again) this Thanksgiving.
Go Gators!
Wasting your time...
Before you even start waving the UF flag, you should know I have no school team pride. I’m an academic person who just happened to love FSU’s red brick, hill-covered campus. And their wonderful music program that produced many of the instructors by whom I have been taught. And the fact that it’s much further north than I have ever lived. I would never choose a school for it’s sports program. That’s like a blind person picking out paintings for their color.
I honestly thought UF produced smarter students than this. An intelligent person would realize that dozens of schools across the nation have first year reading programs (so many, in fact, that Random House publishing has an entire section devoted to Freshman Year Reading).
Also, I am reading the book in order to write an essay that may possibly win all of my books free for two semesters. I discussed with one of the Orientation Leaders (who are responsible for the choice of the book and wrote the guide for us) what we will be doing with the book through the year, and she said that ENC1101 will have assignments based in it, if you’re living on campus (which I’m not) there will be related activities, and the Bio, Sociology, and Philosophy teachers went to extensive workshops on how to incorporate it into their classes. So technically I don’t need to do it (I have ENC1101, 1102, and Lit and I’m taking Education prep courses), but here we come to the biggest point:
It’s actually a good book. Go “Literacy”. Go “Education”. Go “Being a Good Student”.
Go ‘Noles.
I’m sorry that an academic
I’m sorry that an academic person like you chose a school based on the look of its campus rather than something like it’s academics. The only thing FSU has going for it is its music school, but I love the Gator Bands and wouldn’t give up anything for FSU’s music school. I didn’t pick UF because of its sports teams, I picked it because it’s the best engineering school in Florida and one of the top public Universities in the country. If it weren’t for Bright Futures, I’d be at CMU instead. It just so happens that we also have some of the best sports teams in the country as well. As far as the book goes, they said the same things here at UF (aside from the essay contest, which is a cool idea, good luck) but never used it in any of the classes I (and most of my peers) took. They described it as something that all incoming Freshman would have in common so it could be used for discussion purposes, but never was. I was very upset when I got here and found out that I wasted time reading a boring book I didn’t enjoy, when I could have been reading some good books for my personal enjoyment instead. They did bring the author to campus to talk about the book, and maybe if it were a good book I would have gone, but I really feel like there was no purpose for reading the book and that I wasted a good bit of my summer doing something I didn’t have to.
Damn. It's Just a Troll.
Sigh … and here I thought it was going to be a reasonably decent, light-hearted school-versus-school jabfest between two students. Instead of bothering to provide any kind of information that might help back up your claims, you’ve just devolved (remarkably quickly) into taking shots at “any school that isn’t yours.” Or maybe just FSU since you’re hopeful it’ll get a rise out of us.
Bitching about the sports performance of a college originally founded as a women’s college and slowly transitioned into a general-purpose institution, in a comment replying to a woman attending that college (and not in a sports program), is a very poorly-aimed troll.
FSU has a rather well-regarded college of education. Given that Shannon’s aim is “schoolteacher,” methinks she picked the right university. The brick construction turned out to be a nice bonus. I’m genuinely stunned you legitimately think that is what actually convinced a student to attend the university (like almost all students, she applied and was accepted long before visiting the campus in person; whoops, there went that idea).
I suspect there will be no permanent stain or scar on her soul, heart, or academic record stemming from the school’s sports performance, whether it’s good or bad.
As far as your rantings about the book, perhaps you and your peers made poor choices in your class selections the first year? Did you actually take anyone to task at the school for this horrible injustice forced upon you? Was any explanation offered as to why you were encouraged to read a book that would never be referenced again? Did the book have any kind of lesson or values to impart that might be subtly helping you through your college career? Where are “they” who told you to read it during the summer?
Welcome to college. I’m sure you know everything and college is just a “formality” for you, so it’s going to be quite fun as the next four years teach you otherwise.
If you consider reading to be a waste of time, by the way, I wish you lots of luck in that “best engineering school in Florida.” There is value to be derived from any reading experience, even if all you’ve learned is “I’m never reading another book by this author again,” but I’d sure hope you learn that not just from “boredom.”
If you approach your secondary education from the perspective of “only doing what I have to do,” you’ll just “skate by” and be yet another in a long line of generic, barely useful human beings being churned out by our education system. But by all means, please keep up the mindless sports affiliation. Our nation needs a new generation of sports fans to keep the breweries, ticket vendors, concession sellers, and color commentators in business.
Just as an aside — every school claims it is among the “best” universities in the country. Both school in question here are “top 100” schools, so dickwaving is pointless — you’re both attending good schools. The performance of a sports team is irrelevant to the quality of the education each school provides. And an artificially capped admissions count forces the school to be more selective, so keep in mind that being selective doesn’t make it better.
Who said sports is most important?
Gee, I didn’t realize that Physics, Calculus 2, Japanese, and Intro to Forensic Science were “poor choices in my class selection” seeing as how most Freshmen don’t even get to take those classes, they have to wait until their Sophomore year.
And by “Top 100” schools I hope you meant “Top 112 schools”: Florida State University: U.S. News ranking: National Universities, 112 (http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/usnews/edu/college/directory/brief/drglance_1489_brief.php)
University of Florida: U.S. News ranking: National Universities, 49 (http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/usnews/edu/college/directory/brief/drglance_1535_brief.php)
In further support of my argument, UF has the fourth highest percentage of students receiving merit-based (not need-based) aid:
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/brief/webex/merit_brief.php
UF has the 24th best graduate engineering program:
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/grad/eng/search
FSU does have a better graduate education program, but it’s only 49th vs UF’s 53rd.
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/grad/edu/items/06043
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/grad/edu/items/06046
To top it all off, I fail to see how ONE sentence about our sports team in both of my comments leads to your accusation that “Bitching about the sports performance of a college originally founded as a women’s college and slowly transitioned into a general-purpose institution, in a comment replying to a woman attending that college (and not in a sports program), is a very poorly-aimed troll.”
Getting Boring...
I’ll assume the book they “pressured” you into reading wasn’t related to any of these, hmmm? Context is fun; if you remove all relevant context from everything I’ve written I’ll bet you’ll find lots of strawmen to set up. Or maybe I referred to “poor choices in your class selection” to remind you that perhaps you just didn’t get to “use” what was in that book because your classes didn’t steer you into any kind of relevant discussion about it. I bet you could dodge any undesirable topic by carefully choosing your classes.
No, I meant “Top 100,” which is why I wrote it. It is a “top 100” ranking university, ranking 56th in the nation in public universities, 55th in law schools, 92nd in engineering, 45th in education, and so on.
That’s called a “selective bias” — disregarding or downplaying evidence that doesn’t support (or directly contradicts) your position.
And again, both schools are top-100; dickwaving is irrelevant. They’re both public schools. They’re both Florida schools. They both accept the Bright Futures scholarships, and again, both you and Shannon are Bright Futures recipients. Same shit, different colors.
You’re a friggin’ troll, only posting now because you’ve found a moderately amusing argument. Once you get bored with it you’ll vanish into the aether never to return, except perhaps to troll future posts from Shannon on the topic of the book. It still amuses me that even though it was such a waste of your time, you’re willing to argue about it, even when it involves another school (that you’re not attending) and you’re unfamiliar with how that school will handle its subject matter.
Prior to returning for your next FYSR bashing session, I invite you to read this set of pages from FSU’s site, specifically describing the program. While you’re welcome to scoff at its description with a cynical dismissal of the program, perhaps you might consider the alternate possibility while you’re rolling your eyes that FSU may take the program more seriously than UF did. Just because you didn’t participate (and/or find any value from what little participation you did begrudgingly throw in) doesn’t mean others didn’t find it valuable. Other schools may well throw more weight behind this idea, as well. I look forward to hearing about other things FSU has supposedly “ripped off” from your beloved university. Watching pointless devotion to the group that accepted a person, at the expense of all others, provides me with unending entertainment.
It occurs to me that some disclosure might be helpful — I am not a student or alumni of FSU or UF, for whatever that’s worth.
Edit: One last quick point; if you’re still confused about why I’m calling you a troll, remember that your original post wasn’t any kind of attempt to discuss the book or its contents, or even to offer constructive criticism to the author. It was just a “hey! FSU stole that, man! Go Gators!” Classic troll.
Post new comment